Constant Contact and ConvertKit Email Deliverability Comparison
In this comparison, the deliverability of Constant Contact and ConvertKit is compared in detail. All available data, taking the filters into account, is used for the comparison.
Email deliverability
This comparison compares the numbers for sent emails, you can also see in which folder the emails at the email service provider ended up and how many emails were lost on the way. The numbers look better for ConvertKit than for Constant Contact.
| Emails Sent | Emails Inbox | Emails Spam | Emails Lost |
|---|---|---|---|
|
540.483
394.406
|
412.262
302.081
|
107.687
78.208
|
21.069
14.117
|
Email deliverability rates
The following table shows the most important deliverability rates (in percent) for the compared providers. The higher the inbox rate and the lower the spam rate, the better. ConvertKit beats Constant Contact in this comparison.
| Inbox (%) | Spam (%) | Lost (%) |
|---|---|---|
|
76.28 %
76.59 %
|
19.92 %
19.83 %
|
3.90 %
3.58 %
|
Email deliverability by category
This comparison compares the deliverability taking into account the category or the industry. The deliverability can vary greatly depending on the industry. In this comparison, ConvertKit is the clear winner.
| Category | Emails Sent | Emails Inbox | Emails Spam | Emails Lost | Inbox (%) | Spam (%) | Lost (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clothing |
41392
30362
|
32657
24204
|
7282
5178
|
1516
980
|
78.90 %
79.72 %
|
17.59 %
17.05 %
|
3.66 %
3.23 %
|
| Elektronics |
41334
30287
|
31860
23385
|
7982
5902
|
1525
1000
|
77.08 %
77.21 %
|
19.31 %
19.49 %
|
3.69 %
3.30 %
|
| Entertainment |
41622
30255
|
31703
23092
|
8295
6045
|
1627
1118
|
76.17 %
76.32 %
|
19.93 %
19.98 %
|
3.91 %
3.70 %
|
| Cosmetics & Beauty |
41603
30425
|
31719
23232
|
8337
6099
|
1612
1094
|
76.24 %
76.36 %
|
20.04 %
20.05 %
|
3.87 %
3.60 %
|
| Food & Drink |
41617
30373
|
32927
24085
|
7308
5283
|
1447
1005
|
79.12 %
79.30 %
|
17.56 %
17.39 %
|
3.48 %
3.31 %
|
| Home & Garden |
41806
30268
|
32922
24131
|
7393
5167
|
1550
970
|
78.75 %
79.72 %
|
17.68 %
17.07 %
|
3.71 %
3.20 %
|
| Finance |
41990
30282
|
30775
22132
|
9514
6922
|
1751
1228
|
73.29 %
73.09 %
|
22.66 %
22.86 %
|
4.17 %
4.06 %
|
| Health |
41038
30386
|
30441
22511
|
8947
6731
|
1675
1144
|
74.18 %
74.08 %
|
21.80 %
22.15 %
|
4.08 %
3.76 %
|
| Pets |
42146
30515
|
32859
24072
|
7759
5436
|
1559
1007
|
77.96 %
78.89 %
|
18.41 %
17.81 %
|
3.70 %
3.30 %
|
| Sport & Fitness |
41859
30484
|
31437
23007
|
8771
6312
|
1692
1165
|
75.10 %
75.47 %
|
20.95 %
20.71 %
|
4.04 %
3.82 %
|
| Job & Career |
41297
30364
|
30826
22710
|
8756
6456
|
1760
1198
|
74.64 %
74.79 %
|
21.20 %
21.26 %
|
4.26 %
3.95 %
|
| Dating |
41795
30301
|
30105
21762
|
9894
7322
|
1829
1217
|
72.03 %
71.82 %
|
23.67 %
24.16 %
|
4.38 %
4.02 %
|
| Other |
40984
30104
|
32031
23758
|
7449
5355
|
1526
991
|
78.15 %
78.92 %
|
18.18 %
17.79 %
|
3.72 %
3.29 %
|
Email deliverability by email service provider
Finally, the following table compares the deliverability taking into account the email service provider. Similar to the industry, also the email service provider can affect the email deliverability in both directions – positive or negative. In this comparison, Constant Contact is better than ConvertKit.
| Provider | Emails Sent | Emails Inbox | Emails Spam | Emails Lost | Inbox (%) | Spam (%) | Lost (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gmail |
50783
39282
|
36942
28873
|
11716
8892
|
2164
1517
|
72.74 %
73.50 %
|
23.07 %
22.64 %
|
4.26 %
3.86 %
|
| Outlook Mail |
50592
38997
|
37299
28821
|
11167
8633
|
2163
1543
|
73.73 %
73.91 %
|
22.07 %
22.14 %
|
4.28 %
3.96 %
|
| Yahoo Mail |
50611
40103
|
38304
30633
|
10344
8046
|
2014
1424
|
75.68 %
76.39 %
|
20.44 %
20.06 %
|
3.98 %
3.55 %
|
| AOL Mail |
49605
39425
|
37561
30059
|
10008
7908
|
2072
1458
|
75.72 %
76.24 %
|
20.18 %
20.06 %
|
4.18 %
3.70 %
|
| Mail.com |
51145
38624
|
39324
30060
|
9909
7211
|
1950
1353
|
76.89 %
77.83 %
|
19.37 %
18.67 %
|
3.81 %
3.50 %
|
| Yandex Mail |
51255
38821
|
38151
29129
|
11062
8168
|
2129
1524
|
74.43 %
75.03 %
|
21.58 %
21.04 %
|
4.15 %
3.93 %
|
| GMX Mail |
50233
39819
|
38550
30627
|
9835
7798
|
1862
1394
|
76.74 %
76.92 %
|
19.58 %
19.58 %
|
3.71 %
3.50 %
|
| Zoho Mail |
50707
40117
|
39469
31303
|
9484
7430
|
1801
1384
|
77.84 %
78.03 %
|
18.70 %
18.52 %
|
3.55 %
3.45 %
|
| ProtonMail |
50988
39371
|
39687
30858
|
9564
7262
|
1803
1251
|
77.84 %
78.38 %
|
18.76 %
18.45 %
|
3.54 %
3.18 %
|
| Custom Mail |
50909
39847
|
40142
31718
|
9036
6860
|
1784
1269
|
78.85 %
79.60 %
|
17.75 %
17.22 %
|
3.50 %
3.18 %
|
| iCloud Mail |
11115
|
8481
|
2148
|
533
|
76.30 %
%
|
19.33 %
%
|
4.80 %
%
|
| Tuta |
11128
|
9001
|
1722
|
420
|
80.89 %
%
|
15.47 %
%
|
3.77 %
%
|
| Juno.com |
11412
|
9351
|
1692
|
374
|
81.94 %
%
|
14.83 %
%
|
3.28 %
%
|
Compare Constant Contact with other providers
Compare the email deliverability of Constant Contact with other providers.
- Constant Contact and ActiveCampaign comparison
- Constant Contact and Amazon SES comparison
- Constant Contact and AWeber comparison
- Constant Contact and Benchmark Email comparison
- Constant Contact and Brevo comparison
- Constant Contact and CampaignMonitor comparison
- Constant Contact and Clever Elements comparison
- Constant Contact and CleverReach comparison
- Constant Contact and ConvertKit comparison
- Constant Contact and GetResponse comparison
- Constant Contact and HubSpot comparison
- Constant Contact and Kit comparison
- Constant Contact and Klick-Tipp comparison
- Constant Contact and MailChimp comparison
- Constant Contact and MailerLite comparison
- Constant Contact and Mailgun comparison
- Constant Contact and Mailify comparison
- Constant Contact and Mailjet comparison
- Constant Contact and mailtrap comparison
- Constant Contact and Moosend comparison
- Constant Contact and Newsletter2Go comparison
- Constant Contact and Postmark comparison
- Constant Contact and Rapidmail comparison
- Constant Contact and Sarbacane comparison
- Constant Contact and SendGrid comparison
- Constant Contact and SendInBlue comparison
- Constant Contact and SendPulse comparison
Deutsch
English
Русский