Constant Contact and MailerLite Email Deliverability Comparison
In this comparison, the deliverability of Constant Contact and MailerLite is compared in detail. All available data, taking the filters into account, is used for the comparison.
Email deliverability
This comparison compares the numbers for sent emails, you can also see in which folder the emails at the email service provider ended up and how many emails were lost on the way. The numbers look better for MailerLite than for Constant Contact.
Emails Sent | Emails Inbox | Emails Spam | Emails Lost |
---|---|---|---|
402.367
401.873
|
301.987
302.296
|
84.582
84.443
|
15.798
15.134
|
Email deliverability rates
The following table shows the most important deliverability rates (in percent) for the compared providers. The higher the inbox rate and the lower the spam rate, the better. MailerLite beats Constant Contact in this comparison.
Inbox (%) | Spam (%) | Lost (%) |
---|---|---|
75.05 %
75.22 %
|
21.02 %
21.01 %
|
3.93 %
3.77 %
|
Email deliverability by category
This comparison compares the deliverability taking into account the category or the industry. The deliverability can vary greatly depending on the industry. In this comparison, MailerLite is the clear winner.
Category | Emails Sent | Emails Inbox | Emails Spam | Emails Lost | Inbox (%) | Spam (%) | Lost (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Clothing |
30976
30915
|
24160
24147
|
5678
5707
|
1138
1061
|
78.00 %
78.11 %
|
18.33 %
18.46 %
|
3.67 %
3.43 %
|
Elektronics |
30708
30335
|
23290
23042
|
6280
6142
|
1138
1151
|
75.84 %
75.96 %
|
20.45 %
20.25 %
|
3.71 %
3.79 %
|
Entertainment |
30913
30716
|
23150
23154
|
6503
6469
|
1260
1093
|
74.89 %
75.38 %
|
21.04 %
21.06 %
|
4.08 %
3.56 %
|
Cosmetics & Beauty |
30980
31161
|
23228
23314
|
6542
6633
|
1210
1214
|
74.98 %
74.82 %
|
21.12 %
21.29 %
|
3.91 %
3.90 %
|
Food & Drink |
30988
31168
|
24258
24330
|
5647
5767
|
1083
1071
|
78.28 %
78.06 %
|
18.22 %
18.50 %
|
3.49 %
3.44 %
|
Home & Garden |
30946
30857
|
24077
24132
|
5710
5636
|
1159
1089
|
77.80 %
78.21 %
|
18.45 %
18.26 %
|
3.75 %
3.53 %
|
Finance |
31323
31445
|
22433
22561
|
7585
7555
|
1305
1329
|
71.62 %
71.75 %
|
24.22 %
24.03 %
|
4.17 %
4.23 %
|
Health |
30494
31047
|
22117
22601
|
7128
7275
|
1249
1171
|
72.53 %
72.80 %
|
23.38 %
23.43 %
|
4.10 %
3.77 %
|
Pets |
31453
30908
|
24236
23895
|
6044
5927
|
1173
1086
|
77.05 %
77.31 %
|
19.22 %
19.18 %
|
3.73 %
3.51 %
|
Sport & Fitness |
31287
31087
|
23098
23015
|
6922
6872
|
1267
1200
|
73.83 %
74.03 %
|
22.12 %
22.11 %
|
4.05 %
3.86 %
|
Job & Career |
30585
31124
|
22476
22829
|
6813
7030
|
1296
1265
|
73.49 %
73.35 %
|
22.28 %
22.59 %
|
4.24 %
4.06 %
|
Dating |
31242
30448
|
21915
21534
|
7953
7624
|
1374
1290
|
70.15 %
70.72 %
|
25.46 %
25.04 %
|
4.40 %
4.24 %
|
Other |
30472
30662
|
23549
23742
|
5777
5806
|
1146
1114
|
77.28 %
77.43 %
|
18.96 %
18.94 %
|
3.76 %
3.63 %
|
Email deliverability by email service provider
Finally, the following table compares the deliverability taking into account the email service provider. Similar to the industry, also the email service provider can affect the email deliverability in both directions – positive or negative. In this comparison, MailerLite is better than Constant Contact.
Provider | Emails Sent | Emails Inbox | Emails Spam | Emails Lost | Inbox (%) | Spam (%) | Lost (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gmail |
40118
39957
|
28861
28742
|
9595
9528
|
1662
1687
|
71.94 %
71.93 %
|
23.92 %
23.85 %
|
4.14 %
4.22 %
|
Outlook Mail |
39859
40225
|
28875
29282
|
9246
9327
|
1738
1616
|
72.44 %
72.80 %
|
23.20 %
23.19 %
|
4.36 %
4.02 %
|
Yahoo Mail |
39996
39830
|
29886
29778
|
8505
8469
|
1605
1583
|
74.72 %
74.76 %
|
21.26 %
21.26 %
|
4.01 %
3.97 %
|
AOL Mail |
39056
39771
|
29184
29775
|
8220
8467
|
1652
1529
|
74.72 %
74.87 %
|
21.05 %
21.29 %
|
4.23 %
3.84 %
|
Mail.com |
40259
40310
|
30571
30612
|
8129
8181
|
1559
1517
|
75.94 %
75.94 %
|
20.19 %
20.30 %
|
3.87 %
3.76 %
|
Yandex Mail |
40334
39506
|
29556
29099
|
9093
8849
|
1685
1558
|
73.28 %
73.66 %
|
22.54 %
22.40 %
|
4.18 %
3.94 %
|
GMX Mail |
39713
40145
|
30042
30485
|
8191
8253
|
1480
1407
|
75.65 %
75.94 %
|
20.63 %
20.56 %
|
3.73 %
3.50 %
|
Zoho Mail |
40186
39861
|
30900
30734
|
7856
7717
|
1430
1410
|
76.89 %
77.10 %
|
19.55 %
19.36 %
|
3.56 %
3.54 %
|
ProtonMail |
40393
39937
|
30993
30756
|
7951
7850
|
1449
1331
|
76.73 %
77.01 %
|
19.68 %
19.66 %
|
3.59 %
3.33 %
|
Custom Mail |
40422
40311
|
31547
31456
|
7450
7454
|
1425
1401
|
78.04 %
78.03 %
|
18.43 %
18.49 %
|
3.53 %
3.48 %
|
iCloud Mail |
655
691
|
478
510
|
136
145
|
41
36
|
72.98 %
73.81 %
|
20.76 %
20.98 %
|
6.26 %
5.21 %
|
Tuta |
683
662
|
537
536
|
107
102
|
39
24
|
78.62 %
80.97 %
|
15.67 %
15.41 %
|
5.71 %
3.63 %
|
Juno.com |
693
667
|
557
531
|
103
101
|
33
35
|
80.38 %
79.61 %
|
14.86 %
15.14 %
|
4.76 %
5.25 %
|
Compare Constant Contact with other providers
Compare the email deliverability of Constant Contact with other providers.
- Constant Contact and ActiveCampaign comparison
- Constant Contact and Amazon SES comparison
- Constant Contact and AWeber comparison
- Constant Contact and Benchmark Email comparison
- Constant Contact and Brevo comparison
- Constant Contact and CampaignMonitor comparison
- Constant Contact and Clever Elements comparison
- Constant Contact and CleverReach comparison
- Constant Contact and ConvertKit comparison
- Constant Contact and GetResponse comparison
- Constant Contact and HubSpot comparison
- Constant Contact and Kit comparison
- Constant Contact and Klick-Tipp comparison
- Constant Contact and MailChimp comparison
- Constant Contact and MailerLite comparison
- Constant Contact and Mailgun comparison
- Constant Contact and Mailify comparison
- Constant Contact and Mailjet comparison
- Constant Contact and mailtrap comparison
- Constant Contact and Moosend comparison
- Constant Contact and Newsletter2Go comparison
- Constant Contact and Postmark comparison
- Constant Contact and Rapidmail comparison
- Constant Contact and Sarbacane comparison
- Constant Contact and SendGrid comparison
- Constant Contact and SendInBlue comparison
- Constant Contact and SendPulse comparison